Switching Safety Protocol: Duke Energy Labeling Discrepancy Resolved at Hess Station

Customer

AEP

Location

Hess Station, West Virginia

Highlights

  • Switching Error Averted Through Label Verification
  • Model for Interdepartmental Risk Mitigation
  • Catalyst for Broader Labeling and Diagram Audits

Avoiding Switching Hazards Through Accurate Cabinet Labeling at Hess Station

The Challenge

During a walk-through of the switching station at Hess Station, a field technician observed that a cabinet labeled “Potential Cabinet” was not included in the official switching order. This created a potential safety concern: If misunderstood, unlabeled or mislabeled equipment could either be wrongly energized or skipped during clearance procedures. The ambiguity required immediate clarification, particularly because such mislabeling could result in:
  • Unintended exposure to energized components
  • Improper clearance issuance
  • Risk to worker safety during switching and maintenance

The Solution

The issue was escalated to the Transmission Dispatch Center (TDC) for verification:
  • TDC reviewed the one-line diagram, identifying the cabinet as a CCVT (Capacitor Coupled Voltage Transformer), which does not back feed.
  • The clearance was delayed until multiple departments validated the cabinet’s function, confirming that it was safe.
  • The cabinet was temporarily relabeled “CCVT Cab” on-site to prevent confusion, with plans for permanent relabeling to follow.

Key Benefits

  • Improved Label Accuracy: The event exposed the need to align physical labels with one-line diagrams to ensure operational clarity.
  • Risk Avoidance: The delay and verification process ensured no assumptions were made, preventing a possible switching error.
  • Enhanced Interdepartmental Collaboration: The resolution required clear communication between field personnel, dispatch, and engineering.
  • Process Improvement Opportunity: Triggered follow-up for broader station labeling audits and updates.

The Results

  • The mislabeled cabinet did not lead to any incident, thanks to proactive identification and verification.
  • The event is now cited as a lesson in labeling consistency and communication before clearance execution.
  • The temporary label served its purpose until a permanent fix could be applied, keeping field operations aligned with control room documentation.

Unlock Proven Success Stories